January 10, 2009

You Ain't Fat! You Ain't Nothin'!

While at work yesterday, my coworkers and I briefly discussed affirmative action, and at one point the concept of “minority” status arose. While minority used to mean a smaller number of whatever it is that we’re talking about, it now simply means people of a certain skin color and/or ethnic background. Even the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary affirms such: “a part of a population differing from others in some characteristics and often subjected to differential treatment” is listed as the third definition of minority.

This status can remain even if the person—or group as a whole—is in the majority. “But how can a majority still be a minority?” you might ask. Logic does not apply here; this is politics about which we’re speaking.

Keeping this idea in mind, this morning I came across a story that has me wondering what the definition of “normal” might soon be. Moreover, what might the definition of “healthy” become?

A recent Reuters story reports the following:
The number of obese American adults outweighs the number of those who are merely overweight, according to the latest statistics from the federal government.

Numbers posted by the National Center for Health Statistics show that more than 34 percent of Americans are obese, compared to 32.7 percent who are overweight. It said just under 6 percent are “extremely” obese.

More than one-third of adults, or over 72 million people, were obese in 2005-2006, the NCHS said in its report.

The numbers are based on a survey of 4,356 adults over the age of 20 who take part in a regular government survey of health, said the NCHS, which is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The article also states that while “overweight” numbers have remained steady since 1980, the number of “obese” cases has more than doubled.

Now you might make the argument that definitions of overweight and obese have changed, as determined by looking at body mass index (BMI). This is a legitimate argument because understanding health issues changes over time through scientific study. We know things today that we didn’t know 20 or 30 years ago.

My concern is one that is rooted more in the aforementioned affirmative action discussion: What happens if overweight is the new healthy?

Consider the possibility that more and more Americans become overweight and obese. The concept of “normal” or even “healthy” gradually takes a shift to the fat end of the scale. If the majority of people are overweight or obese (using today’s definitions), do people who are currently thin or healthy gradually become malnourished or scrawny? If more and more people get fatter and fatter, does that suddenly become the acceptable size? Doesn’t the majority define things? Don’t the spoils of war go to the victors?

Look at what used to be considered a desirable soldier for the United States Army at the outset of World War II. In his book D-Day, Stephen E. Ambrose writes:
The American Selective Service System was just that, selective. One-third of the men called to service were rejected after physical examinations, making the average draftee brighter, healthier, and better educated than the average American. He was twenty-six years old, five feet eight inches tall, weighed 144 pounds, had a thirty-three-and-a-half-inch chest, and a thirty-one-inch waist. After thirteen weeks of basic training, he’d gained seven pounds (and converted many of his original pounds from fat to muscle) and added at least an inch to his chest. Nearly half the draftees were high-school graduates; one in ten had some college. As Geoffrey Perret puts it in his history of the US Army in World War II, “These were the best-educated enlisted men of any army in history.”
Can you imagine if a man who was 5’8” and 144 pounds tried to join the military today? He’d be forced to eat more and lift weights more. This excerpt even touches upon something else that applies to this possible shifting definition of average or normal: education levels. A higher percentage of our population today has graduated from college than 50 years ago. Does that mean that we’re more intelligent? Does it mean that a college degree has gone down in value if they’re almost as ubiquitous as a high school diploma? Does it simply mean that the idea of average American has shifted to that of college-educated and nothing more?

According to the United States Census Bureau, in 1940 the percentage of the population with a high school diploma was 24.5 percent; in 2000 it was 80.4 percent. In 1940, 4.6 percent of the US population had a bachelor’s degree or higher; in 2000 24.4 percent had a bachelor’s degree or higher. Does this mean that we are more intelligent today or does it mean that we are just seeing bachelor’s degrees becoming the new high school diploma? Will we eventually see Ph.D.s become the new bachelor’s degree?

Let’s carry this back to the fat thing once again. If more and more people become obese, doesn’t today’s “overweight” population become the “average” group? I’m currently five-feet-nine-inches tall and 147 pounds. In terms of health, I feel better than I ever did. Unfortunately I’m on my way to being at the far end of the spectrum only because the population which defines the spectrum is apparently moving the other way. Thus, I might be deemed “unhealthy” or “abnormal” in a few years. I might also be called a sell-out, à la Weird Al’s “Fat” video where the fat guy asks, “What it is wit’ you? You on some kind of diet?” and, “The question is: Are you fat or what?” (If I’m not “abnormal” already; a few weeks ago I had a woman tell me that “real” men don’t care about their health—but that’s a blog post for another time.)

I’m going to go grab a bowl of vegetable soup and mull this over.

References
Ambrose, Stephen E. D-Day: June 6, 1944: The Climactic Battle of World War II. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994.

Fox, Maggie. “Obese Americans Now Outweigh the Merely Overweight.” Reuters. 9 Jan. 2009.

Minority.” The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary.

United States. Bureau of the Census. “A Half-Century of Learning: Historical Statistics on Educational Attainment in the United States, 1940 to 2000.” 23 Feb. 2007. 10 Jan. 2009.

Yankovic, Al. “Fat.” Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, 1988.

Ω

3 comments:

Pessimistic Optimist said...

Seriously, you gotta get working on blocking up your arteries.
I've always found my body to be funny, especially in terms of what people have said to me. When I was modeling, I was too skinny by some average college retards. Of course I was in great shape, cut, and my arms were bigger than anyone who said I was skinny. A guy with a beer belly said the same of me. Of course, they're forgetting that prior to that I weighed thiry-five pounds more. I have gained probably 50 pounds since then. I was complete muscle (yes, complete muscle at 230, I'm now 240- but obviously we all know how tall I am, too). People have actually had the nerve to say I was fat (especially recently)...people, who of course were fatter than me. Now, I'm no marathon runner, but I definitely don't even look out of shape. Let's cut back to a couple months ago when I was nothing but 230 lbs of muscle. I had people saying I was on steriods and that I got too big.
Now, I'm being selfish by only focusing on myself here, but I'm curious as to what I should be then. I'm too thin at a model-shaped 185 or 190, I'm too big and muscular at 225-230, and I'm too fat at 240...hmmm...so if I was 215 and a mix of a swimmer's and bodybuilder's physique I would probably be chastised for being too in shape.
Now my question is this. How comes, no matter how fat or thin I am, I still look like a typical in shape guy, yet you (and obviously not "you" directly, but "you" as retards in general) are allowed to be utterly and disgustingly fat for 28 years (and probably you're whole fucking life)? What makes the bar set higher for me? Why can't I be fine with what I look like, when other people are more than accepted for looking fucking despicable (I'm not trying to be mean, but why hold back when others have started being mean first...haha)?
Now, I am going to a whole different topic here, because I'm going into the realm of "Why is the bar set higher for me?" (which in some cases, I do understand why it is because of what I do career-wise) but in even the case of health and physique, why the fuck is the bar set higher for me and yet lowered for Hillbilly Bill and his wife Betsy Beerbelly?
And in this case, why the fuck do people want you to be fat? So they don't have to feel bad about themselves being out of shape and you actually being in shape. This comes back to the whole American Idol blog (and mentality).

Chase Edwards Cooper said...

In my case I think it was that she was used to the local men: camo-clad rednecks in a pick-up with Confederate flag license plates and gun racks.

Let’s go out next weekend and eat as much food as possible in order to increase our manliness.

Chase Edwards Cooper said...

You know, one other thing that I thought about which might be related to some of this stuff is the mentality that we talked about a few months ago where people think “This is what you’re ‘supposed to’ do.” They don’t really think about why they think what they think, they just view it that way because their family or peers told them that it’s supposed to be that way with no meaning or substance behind it. Essentially, it’s just superficial nonsense, but it’s superficial nonsense that they’ve come to accept.

They go to church every Sunday without actually thinking about why they go or even what their religion means; you go because you’re “supposed to.” Their view is that right after college you’re “supposed to” get married, have kids, two cars, a boat, and a house with a white picket fence—never mind that the marriage might be full of tension or that you can’t afford kids or the big house at the moment. You’re “supposed to” listen to a different type of music after high school and then again after college.

It reminds me of one other thing that was brought up when told a few people who my friends are, and specifically that some are either older or younger than me. I was asked why I don’t hang out with people my own age, namely people who went to high school with me. I had said that I spend time with people who have things in common with me, no matter if they’re older or younger. I then got a look that seemed to say “I don’t get it.” I realized then that the superficial aspect of friendship was more important to some people than the substance aspect. Unfortunately, to the person who mentioned it, I was “supposed to” hang out with people from high school because that’s what you’re “supposed to” do: you hang out with people from high school the rest of your life.

I want to say that this is a local thing, but maybe it’s an American thing. It’s why I said that I’ve come to understand that being an adult means preaching the virtues of creativity, individuality, and diversity to children while simultaneously preaching the virtues of conformity, uniformity, and collective thought to your peers.

Think about it: that’s what politics is based on. “Coming together” and “uniting” would never happen if we really supported diversity and individuality as much as some people claim to. Too many of the people who use those words don’t mean it.